Photographic Revolution
| by Raul Pop | March 24, 2007
Have you ever looked through your parents old photo albums, with pictures of them when they were still kids? Ever seen the black and whites of your grandparents or maybe parents wedding? Did you ever consider your children might look at your baby pictures in the same way? Or have you thought photography has evolved as much as it possibly can?
If youve answered yes to the latter, then Im sorry, but scientists at the University of California, San Francisco are determined to prove you wrong. Theyve already started a revolution in the domain of photography, even though its still in its early stages. Bacterial photography is the subject of their studies and as the name suggests, yes, they do use bacteria to create pictures. By slightly altering the DNA of a certain strand of E-coli bacteria, scientists have successfully managed to teach it to create a dark pigment according to the amount of light it receives. Translated into English, that means the bacteria that dont get sufficient light will appear darker than those that do. Sadly, this means the image can only be monochrome, but due to the small size of the bacteria, it is of much greater detail, such as 100 megapixels per square inch. If that doesnt ring a bell, youll just have to trust me when I say its 10 times sharper than your high-performance camera and 50 times sharper than your average cell phone camera.
Of course, there is a very obvious drawback to it, besides the monotony of monochrome images. Did any of you feel uneasy when I said E-coli? Of course, that would make anyone feel a bit uneasy about the device, but scientists have assured us that this is a harmless strand of the bacteria. If theyre able to manufacture a biological light sensor, they should be able to know how dangerous it is, shouldnt they? If there was a risk of an outbreak, Id like to think the project wouldve never reached the publics ears. But as others have very well put it Out of all the strands of bacteria known to man, only a few are actually dangerous. Most of us have millions of harmless ones in our system and never find out about it.
Despite the fairly limited possibilities that bacterial photography offers at the moment, it has enormous potential. We must keep in mind that weve barely learned to sit up straight in this field, well need some more time before we actually learn to walk University of California representatives commented. Although its a bit early for predictions, this new discovery will make current digital cameras look obsolete, much like black and white ones seem to us now. And that is exactly what we need pioneers to drive our world forward, because if none of us would ever have taken a risk, we wouldnt be where we are today.
If youve answered yes to the latter, then Im sorry, but scientists at the University of California, San Francisco are determined to prove you wrong. Theyve already started a revolution in the domain of photography, even though its still in its early stages. Bacterial photography is the subject of their studies and as the name suggests, yes, they do use bacteria to create pictures. By slightly altering the DNA of a certain strand of E-coli bacteria, scientists have successfully managed to teach it to create a dark pigment according to the amount of light it receives. Translated into English, that means the bacteria that dont get sufficient light will appear darker than those that do. Sadly, this means the image can only be monochrome, but due to the small size of the bacteria, it is of much greater detail, such as 100 megapixels per square inch. If that doesnt ring a bell, youll just have to trust me when I say its 10 times sharper than your high-performance camera and 50 times sharper than your average cell phone camera.
Of course, there is a very obvious drawback to it, besides the monotony of monochrome images. Did any of you feel uneasy when I said E-coli? Of course, that would make anyone feel a bit uneasy about the device, but scientists have assured us that this is a harmless strand of the bacteria. If theyre able to manufacture a biological light sensor, they should be able to know how dangerous it is, shouldnt they? If there was a risk of an outbreak, Id like to think the project wouldve never reached the publics ears. But as others have very well put it Out of all the strands of bacteria known to man, only a few are actually dangerous. Most of us have millions of harmless ones in our system and never find out about it.
Despite the fairly limited possibilities that bacterial photography offers at the moment, it has enormous potential. We must keep in mind that weve barely learned to sit up straight in this field, well need some more time before we actually learn to walk University of California representatives commented. Although its a bit early for predictions, this new discovery will make current digital cameras look obsolete, much like black and white ones seem to us now. And that is exactly what we need pioneers to drive our world forward, because if none of us would ever have taken a risk, we wouldnt be where we are today.
Article Source: http://www.articleset.com

You are welcome to publish or reprint this article free of charge, provided:
- you include the entire article, unchanged, including the "About The Author" box
- all hyperlinks remain active, including the bottom ArticleSet.com link (does not apply to print publications)
- you agree not to hold the authors nor ArticleSet.com liable for any loss profits, expenses, or any other damages resulting from the use or misuse of articles published on this website