Outsourcing became part of the business (Majorly Software and Call Centre) during the mid 1980s and often refers to the delegation of non-core operations from internal production to an external entity specializing in the management of that operation.
The decision to outsource is often made by many organizations keeping in mind the following advantages:
1. The interest of lowering firm costs
2. Redirecting or conserving energy directed at the competencies of a particular business, or to make more efficient use of worldwide labor, capital, technology and resources.

Though often used interchangeably, outsourcing differs from offshoring in that outsourcing is relative to the restructuring of the firm while offshoring is relative to the nation,though the two are not mutually exclusive, especially under conditions of globalization.
Fundamentally and historically, outsourcing is a term relative to the organization of labor within and between societies.

Is that a Good Pick for any organization??
------------------------------------------------------------
People often say --- Outsourcing is not necessarily a job destroyer but rather a process of job relocation and may not impact the net number of jobs in a nation or in the global economy.

Contrary to the critics, rampant unemployment is not occurring in the United States. Logically, "outsourcing" cannot occur without a recipient that "insources" and, according to economists, "outsourcing" means an export in services which renders "insourcing" an import. Hence, economists insist on viewing the outsourcing/insourcing debate as a debate on trade, adequately analyzed with trade theory and recorded through official national data.
Some reports say that the U.S. and the UK actually have the largest net trade surpluses in business services. However, some other countries, such as Indonesia, Germany and Ireland have a net deficit in business services. Similar reports state that "while [the U.S. is] exporting some jobs to other countries, the greatest beneficiary of outsourcing is the U.S. itself.
But may be outsorcing has boosted US economy multiple times , what about the job security for US employees. Some statistics revealed that holding contract jobs became much more difficult these days. I think most of the well settled international employees working in US DO NOT want or rather support outsourcing to their own countries due to multiple reasons:
1. Income
2. Savings
3. Settled family Life
4. Job satisfaction
5. comfort levels at the job location

One criticism of outsourcing is that product quality suffers. The counter-argument to this is that loss of quality is not a result of the practice of outsourcing itself; the corporations involved in an outsourcing arrangement are responsible for maintaining the quality of their services.

To summarize, I strongly feel that outsoucing might generate tons of income to any country with the expense of settled employee's job insecurity.

Article Source: http://www.articleset.com