Engage in a Constructive Debate About Genetically Modified Crops
| by James Wachai | December 06, 2006
Richard Heinberg, famous for his rantings against Big Oil, in October delivered a lecture at the E. F. Schumacher Society in Stockbridge, Massachusetts on October 28, 2006.
The abbreviated text of the lecture entitled Fifty Million Farmers, is available in the online edition of Energy Bulletin November 17, 2006.
In the lecture, Mr. Heinberg forecasted that prolonged famine looms in the United States due to, among other factors, the effects of global warming, shortage of fuel, and increasing scarcity of water.
Even agricultural technologies such as genetic engineering, according to Mr. Heinberg, would do nothing to alleviate food shortage in the U.S.
This is what he said about genetically modified crops. Our collective experience with genetically modifying crops so far shows that glowing promises of higher yields, or of the reduced need for herbicides, have seldom been fulfilled.
He went on, At the same time, new genetic technologies carry with them the potential for horrific unintended consequences in the forms of negative impacts on human health and the integrity of ecosystems.
Mr. Heinbergs rantings about GM crops sound like a comic strip. First what does he mean by Our collective experience with genetically modified crops ? Whose collective experience is he referring to? His Our collective experience is null and void considering that 200 million acres of genetically modified crops are being grown in more than 21 countries.
Its even more misleading for Mr. Heinberg to say that new genetic technologies pose horrific threats to human health. This is mere sensationalism because he doesnt even bother to identify these horrific threats.
Mr. Heinbergs lecture reminds me of a video clip in YouTube that equally attempts to discredit genetically modified crops without any scientific justification. Entitled Contaminated the video, as is the habit of anti-technology activists, dwells on hearsays and lies about modern agricultural biotechnology. What do people stand to gain from distorting scientific facts?
Its time the world resorts to a civil discourse about GM crops. Lets dwell on the science behind genetically modified crops rather than half-baked issues only tailored to instill fear and despondence in consumers.
Article Source: http://www.articleset.com

You are welcome to publish or reprint this article free of charge, provided:
- you include the entire article, unchanged, including the "About The Author" box
- all hyperlinks remain active, including the bottom ArticleSet.com link (does not apply to print publications)
- you agree not to hold the authors nor ArticleSet.com liable for any loss profits, expenses, or any other damages resulting from the use or misuse of articles published on this website