Can You Compare Early 1930s With 2008?
| by lynThomas | November 14, 2008
The end of 2007 and throughout 2008 has seen a disastrous 'flattening' experience for millions. Banks, stocks and real estate have crashed. Assets are being sold off in an attempt to reduce debt on balance sheets. Time and again there have been tales reported of hundreds of millions of dollars being wiped off. People all over the world village sit with bated breath waiting for the 'axe' to descend on them.
The economy is headed for a liquidity trap. Interest rates will be lowered to such a rate they will fail to attract investors, says Colin Twigg of IG Markets. When banks are forced to liquidate assets, call in loans, it could set off a downward spiral, with echoes of the 1930s.
The alternative would be for nations to print more money. However, this could bring about the same result as Zimbabwe with its 100,000 p.a. rate of inflation.
In the 1930's:
1929 investors had a currency that was backed by gold
Preceded by a housing boom, plus cheap credit
Financial system less sophisticated records with pen and paper
In 1929 millions were left ignorant because communication was snail mail.
Communications were changed through 'Indian whispers'
Information was difficult to get
Relatively US Federal bank was new and made regular mistakes
The government and big spending programs were distrusted by the voters
People caused runs on the banks as they panicked and withdrew money
Some say the government of the 1930s was more capable of handling a financial melt down
No safety net had been devised
The people were industrious and hard working, growing their own vegetables etc. 90% of jobs were rural.
Credit was difficult to gain for most people
There was a surplus in trade as people were more able to create trade items
National borrowing on a large scale was unheard of
People lived more locally and went without or made do
40% of the nations wealth in America was owned by 1% of the population
The richest 0.1% controlled 11.5% of income in the US
In 2008:
In 2008 the dollars are backed by IOUs from the worlds biggest debtor, the US
A housing boom and cheap credit preceded the melt down
Today we have sophisticated financial models which we believed in implicitly until they failed
2008's communication is global, immediate interaction, measured in milliseconds
Information is instantly transferred and more easily checked for accuracy
Information pours around the globe daily
In 2008 the Fed patrols financial markets, dousing flare-ups with highly flammable material
Today the government is the big spender saying it is 'rescuing' the economy
Large groups of people have a choice of losing their money by selling their shares or waiting in hope of a better future
Many people questions the ability of the governments of the world to meet the melt down
The say there is a safety net in place (?)
In 2008 only supermarkets 'grow' vegetables for the vast majority of the populace
In 2008 there is a more urban population
There is huge public and private indebtedness
We see a massive trade indebtedness with little or no ability to create trade items
Millions of dollars are borrowed every day by most nations
2008 has a global village which is highly consumer orientated
In 2008 the wealth is more widely spread so the top 1% have less impact on the nation
The richest 0.1% controls 11.6% of income in the US.
While the financial melt-down in 2008 has been much steeper than the four year plunge of the 1930s, will we recover any quicker in 2009? We continue to borrow simply to pay back on what we have already borrowed. The 'house of cards' of 2008 is hundreds of times bigger than it was in the 1930's.
The economy is headed for a liquidity trap. Interest rates will be lowered to such a rate they will fail to attract investors, says Colin Twigg of IG Markets. When banks are forced to liquidate assets, call in loans, it could set off a downward spiral, with echoes of the 1930s.
The alternative would be for nations to print more money. However, this could bring about the same result as Zimbabwe with its 100,000 p.a. rate of inflation.
In the 1930's:
1929 investors had a currency that was backed by gold
Preceded by a housing boom, plus cheap credit
Financial system less sophisticated records with pen and paper
In 1929 millions were left ignorant because communication was snail mail.
Communications were changed through 'Indian whispers'
Information was difficult to get
Relatively US Federal bank was new and made regular mistakes
The government and big spending programs were distrusted by the voters
People caused runs on the banks as they panicked and withdrew money
Some say the government of the 1930s was more capable of handling a financial melt down
No safety net had been devised
The people were industrious and hard working, growing their own vegetables etc. 90% of jobs were rural.
Credit was difficult to gain for most people
There was a surplus in trade as people were more able to create trade items
National borrowing on a large scale was unheard of
People lived more locally and went without or made do
40% of the nations wealth in America was owned by 1% of the population
The richest 0.1% controlled 11.5% of income in the US
In 2008:
In 2008 the dollars are backed by IOUs from the worlds biggest debtor, the US
A housing boom and cheap credit preceded the melt down
Today we have sophisticated financial models which we believed in implicitly until they failed
2008's communication is global, immediate interaction, measured in milliseconds
Information is instantly transferred and more easily checked for accuracy
Information pours around the globe daily
In 2008 the Fed patrols financial markets, dousing flare-ups with highly flammable material
Today the government is the big spender saying it is 'rescuing' the economy
Large groups of people have a choice of losing their money by selling their shares or waiting in hope of a better future
Many people questions the ability of the governments of the world to meet the melt down
The say there is a safety net in place (?)
In 2008 only supermarkets 'grow' vegetables for the vast majority of the populace
In 2008 there is a more urban population
There is huge public and private indebtedness
We see a massive trade indebtedness with little or no ability to create trade items
Millions of dollars are borrowed every day by most nations
2008 has a global village which is highly consumer orientated
In 2008 the wealth is more widely spread so the top 1% have less impact on the nation
The richest 0.1% controls 11.6% of income in the US.
While the financial melt-down in 2008 has been much steeper than the four year plunge of the 1930s, will we recover any quicker in 2009? We continue to borrow simply to pay back on what we have already borrowed. The 'house of cards' of 2008 is hundreds of times bigger than it was in the 1930's.
Article Source: http://www.articleset.com

You are welcome to publish or reprint this article free of charge, provided:
- you include the entire article, unchanged, including the "About The Author" box
- all hyperlinks remain active, including the bottom ArticleSet.com link (does not apply to print publications)
- you agree not to hold the authors nor ArticleSet.com liable for any loss profits, expenses, or any other damages resulting from the use or misuse of articles published on this website